ChatGPT写作反馈的有效性及应用于英语写作教学的可行性研究
Journal: Educational Research DOI: 10.12238/er.v8i5.6105
Abstract
随着生成式AI的发展，ChatGPT作为自动写作评估（AWE）工具在二语写作教学中的应用前景逐渐受到关注。本研究探讨了使用ChatGPT生成的写作反馈的有效性及其在英语写作教学中的可行性。研究通过对广东省某大学商务英语专业大一学生的实验数据分析，比较了ChatGPT写作反馈与教师反馈对学生语言进步的影响，结果显示两者在提升写作能力方面效果相似。同时，学生对ChatGPT和教师反馈的偏好各有不同，部分学生更喜欢教师反馈中的人性化互动，另一些学生则更青睐ChatGPT写作反馈的清晰和具体性。本研究的主要启示是ChatGPT写作反馈可以融于英语写作课程，在英语写作教学中教师可以采用ChatGPT反馈与教师反馈结合的混合模式，以兼顾技术优势与人文关怀，从而有效提升学生的写作水平。
Keywords
二语写作；教师反馈；动写作评估系统；AI；ChatGPT写作反馈；有效性
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V. 2. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment [J]. 2006,4 (3).
[2] Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. Language models are few-shot learners [M]. 2020, Curran Associates Inc.
[3] Dai, Y., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT in providing corrective feedback for undergraduate writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning [J]. 2023(4): 467-488.
[4] Davis, S., Smith, P., & Zhang, Y. Trust and skepticism: Students' perceptions of AI-generated feedback in writing courses. Journal of Academic Writing [J]. 2023(1): 1-19.
[5] Goldstein, L. M. Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms [M]. 2005, University of Michigan Press.
[6] Hyland, K. Second language writing [M]. 2003, Cambridge University Press.
[7] Jiang, L., & Yu, S. . Exploring the effects of different types of teacher feedback on EFL student writing performance. Language Teaching Research [J]. 2021(6): 913-931.
[8] Huawei, W., & Aryadoust, V. A review of automated writing evaluation systems: How do they compare with human raters? Language Testing in Asia [J]. 2023(1): 19-34.
[9] Li, M., & Chen, Q. Challenges in the use of AI-based writing evaluation tools in EFL contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research [J]. 2023(3):789-810.
[2] Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. Language models are few-shot learners [M]. 2020, Curran Associates Inc.
[3] Dai, Y., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT in providing corrective feedback for undergraduate writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning [J]. 2023(4): 467-488.
[4] Davis, S., Smith, P., & Zhang, Y. Trust and skepticism: Students' perceptions of AI-generated feedback in writing courses. Journal of Academic Writing [J]. 2023(1): 1-19.
[5] Goldstein, L. M. Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms [M]. 2005, University of Michigan Press.
[6] Hyland, K. Second language writing [M]. 2003, Cambridge University Press.
[7] Jiang, L., & Yu, S. . Exploring the effects of different types of teacher feedback on EFL student writing performance. Language Teaching Research [J]. 2021(6): 913-931.
[8] Huawei, W., & Aryadoust, V. A review of automated writing evaluation systems: How do they compare with human raters? Language Testing in Asia [J]. 2023(1): 19-34.
[9] Li, M., & Chen, Q. Challenges in the use of AI-based writing evaluation tools in EFL contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research [J]. 2023(3):789-810.
Copyright © 2025 唐小毅
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
