AI-enabled smart teaching: empirical research based on knowledge graphs and learning profiles for university chemistry
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v8i2.5026
Abstract
Against the backdrop of digital transformation in education, smart teaching has become an important trend in the reform of higher engineering education. College chemistry features systematic content, abstract concepts, and tight logical connections. Traditional blended teaching, however, still falls short in process supervision, learning status diagnosis, and personalized support. This study combined knowledge graphs, learning profiles, and intelligent teaching assistants to build an integrated smart teaching model, and conducted a quasi-experiment with 277 engineering students. Results show that the experimental group performed notably better than the control group in learning task completion rate and mastery of difficult and key knowledge points. Both groups achieved a pass rate of over 96%, but the experimental group demonstrated distinct advantages in learning equity, process management, and precise tutoring. This model can effectively optimize learning paths, enhance process guidance, and promote knowledge internalization, providing empirical references for the smart teaching reform of basic science and engineering courses in universities.
Keywords
AI-assisted teaching; smart teaching; university chemistry; knowledge graph; empirical study
Funding
This paper was supported by Teaching Reform Project of Henan Agricultural University (2024XJGLX187).
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1] Bahri A, Arifin AN, Jamaluddin AB, et al. Smart teaching based on lesson study promoting student's digital literacy in the rural area[J]. European Journal of Educational Research, 2023, 12(2): 901-911.
[2] Peng C, Xia F, Naseriparsa M, et al. Knowledge graphs: opportunities and challenges[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(11):13071-13102.
[3] Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A review[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 75264-75278.
[4] Roll I, Wylie R. Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2016, 26(2): 582-599.
[5] Tang X, Ni J, Meng Y, et al. Knowledge graphs as cognitive scaffolding for sustainable engineering education: a quasi-experimental study in structural geology[J]. Sustainability, 2026, 18(2): 736.
[6] Jang EE, Lajoie SP, Wagner M, et al. Person-oriented approaches to profiling learners in technology-rich learning environments for ecological learner modeling[J]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2017, 55(4): 552-597.
[2] Peng C, Xia F, Naseriparsa M, et al. Knowledge graphs: opportunities and challenges[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(11):13071-13102.
[3] Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A review[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 75264-75278.
[4] Roll I, Wylie R. Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education[J]. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2016, 26(2): 582-599.
[5] Tang X, Ni J, Meng Y, et al. Knowledge graphs as cognitive scaffolding for sustainable engineering education: a quasi-experimental study in structural geology[J]. Sustainability, 2026, 18(2): 736.
[6] Jang EE, Lajoie SP, Wagner M, et al. Person-oriented approaches to profiling learners in technology-rich learning environments for ecological learner modeling[J]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2017, 55(4): 552-597.
Copyright © 2026 Dandan HAN, Dan WU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
