The Implications of Four Learning Theories forSecond Language Acquisition

Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v7i8.4527

Yinghui Wu

Zhaoqing University

Abstract

As a consistently highlighted topic in academia, learning is intricately linked to a wide array of human activities, among which second language acquisition (SLA) stands out as a prominent example. Thus, this paper systematically discusses four learning theories and analyzes their potential implications for the SLA process. In specific, these four theories, namely Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Humanism and Constructivism are examined. Given such a comprehensive investigation of learning theories and a thorough analysis of their implications, this study seeks to synthesize and propose several theory-informed and effective language learning methods, with an attempt to enhance the outcomes of language learning and ultimately facilitate second language acquisition.

Keywords

Learning; Learning Theories, Second Language Acquisition (SLA), Language Learning Methods

References

[1] Brown. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Fourth Edition[M]. Pearson ESL.
[2] Hu Zhuanglin.2011. Linguistics:A Course Book[M].Peking University Press.
[3] William & Rechard.1999. Handbook of Behaviorism[M].Academic Press.
[4] Ellis, R. 1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition[M].Oxford University Press.
[5] Piaget, M.1987. Possibility and Necessity I: The Role of Possibility in Cognitive Development[M].University of Minnesota Press.
[6] Ausubel, D. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning[M]. New York: Grune & Stratton.
[7] Donald, M. 2001. The Roots and Genealogy of Humanistic Psychology[M].Sage Publications.
[8 ]Maslow. 2017. A Theory of Motivation[M].Black Curtain Press.

Copyright © 2025 Yinghui Wu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License