Analysis and mitigation of spatial and social inequality in the distribution of low-floor trams in Melbourne
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v7i7.4306
Abstract
Melbourne has the longest and most comprehensive tram network in the world, but its accessibility remains uneven, particularly for vulnerable groups who rely on low-floor trams. Despite numerous commitments made through policies or regulations, only 38% trams in the fleet and 27% tram stops are currently accessible. Thus, this paper critically examines spatial and social inequities embedded in the distribution of low floor trams across Melbourne tram network. Findings reveal the prioritization of high patronage routes over areas with more social need, limited funding commitments, and fragmented infrastructure upgrades, collectively causing social exclusion for vulnerable groups. This study argues that efficiency-driven strategies have entrenched social inequity, focusing on the need for social justice, participatory, and redistributive strategies to make public transport more inclusive.
Keywords
inclusive city; social equality; transport planning; urban planning; network planning
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 9 TimesReferences
[1] Reisi M, Aye L, Rajabifard A, et al. 2014. Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study. Ecological Indicators, 43: 288-296.
[2] Yarra Trams (2025). https://yarratrams.com.au
[3] Whitzman C, Legacy C, Andrew C, et al. 2013. Building inclusive cities. Women's Safety and the Right to the City, Routledge.
[4] Ainscow M, Booth T, Dyson A. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. Routledge.
[5] Fraser N. 2009. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (Vol. 31). Columbia University Press.
[6] Fainstein SS. 2014. The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1): 1-18.
[7] Lope DJ, Dolgun A. 2020. Measuring the inequality of accessible trams in Melbourne. Journal of Transport Geography, 83:102657.
[8] Scheurer J, Curtis C. 2019. Reducing social spatial inequity with public transport in Melbourne, Australia. In A Companion to Transport, Space and Equity, 25-38. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[9] Victorian Auditor-General's Office report, 2021. https://www.audit.vic.gov.au
[2] Yarra Trams (2025). https://yarratrams.com.au
[3] Whitzman C, Legacy C, Andrew C, et al. 2013. Building inclusive cities. Women's Safety and the Right to the City, Routledge.
[4] Ainscow M, Booth T, Dyson A. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. Routledge.
[5] Fraser N. 2009. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (Vol. 31). Columbia University Press.
[6] Fainstein SS. 2014. The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1): 1-18.
[7] Lope DJ, Dolgun A. 2020. Measuring the inequality of accessible trams in Melbourne. Journal of Transport Geography, 83:102657.
[8] Scheurer J, Curtis C. 2019. Reducing social spatial inequity with public transport in Melbourne, Australia. In A Companion to Transport, Space and Equity, 25-38. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[9] Victorian Auditor-General's Office report, 2021. https://www.audit.vic.gov.au
Copyright © 2025 Peidong LIU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License