An Exploration of Language Learning Theories from Linguistic and Psychological: Focusing on Universal Grammar and Interactionist Theory
Journal: Region - Educational Research and Reviews DOI: 10.32629/rerr.v7i6.4187
Abstract
This paper explores language learning theories from linguistic and psychological perspectives, with a focus on Universal Grammar (UG) and Interactionist Theory. It elaborates on their core constructs: UG involves innate principles and adjustable parameters, while Interactionist Theory centers on input, output, interaction, recast, and attention. The study also analyzes their pedagogical implications, such as proper use of mother tongue and authentic context setting for UG, and modified input and meaning negotiation for Interactionist Theory, along with practical applications. It aims to provide comprehensive insights to optimize foreign language teaching methodologies.
Keywords
language learning theory, Universal Grammar, Interactionist Theory.
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 0 TimesReferences
[1]Brown, H.D. (2001). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[2]Wei, Y. L. (2022). An analysis of Chomsky’s universal grammar from the perspective of second language acquisition [J]. Journal of Western Studies, (01), 116-120.
[3]Su, J. H. (2010). On the explanatory power of universal grammar from the generality of principle and parameter [J]. Journal of Zhangzhou Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (02), 86-92.
[4]Sun, Z. F. (2017). A review of Chomsky’s “X-bar” theory [J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Humanities & Social Sciences), (S1), 165-166.
[5] Wen, Q. F. (2019). Research on Key Issues in Second Language Acquisition [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[6] Shi, L. F. (2001). Learning Theory [M]. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
[7] Carroll, Susanne E. (2001). Input and Evidence. [M]. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.
[8] Wang, R. Y. (2007). A study on language output in Gass’s acquisition model [J]. Journal of Hunan City University, (06), 94-96.
[2]Wei, Y. L. (2022). An analysis of Chomsky’s universal grammar from the perspective of second language acquisition [J]. Journal of Western Studies, (01), 116-120.
[3]Su, J. H. (2010). On the explanatory power of universal grammar from the generality of principle and parameter [J]. Journal of Zhangzhou Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (02), 86-92.
[4]Sun, Z. F. (2017). A review of Chomsky’s “X-bar” theory [J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Humanities & Social Sciences), (S1), 165-166.
[5] Wen, Q. F. (2019). Research on Key Issues in Second Language Acquisition [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[6] Shi, L. F. (2001). Learning Theory [M]. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
[7] Carroll, Susanne E. (2001). Input and Evidence. [M]. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press.
[8] Wang, R. Y. (2007). A study on language output in Gass’s acquisition model [J]. Journal of Hunan City University, (06), 94-96.
Copyright © 2025 Xuechun Shi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License