Preparing for the Future: Policy Responses for South Korea's Aging Population
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v6i5.4531
Abstract
South Korea has one of the fastest demographic transitions in OECD countries, with fertility rates being low and ageing rapidly, which jeopardizes its long-term economic sustainability and social interactions. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of South Korea's policy responses to population aging and identify the governance challenges to the sustainability of these responses. This paper is based on a qualitative policy analysis framework that is a combination of document analysis, secondary data analysis and comparative assessment with France and the Netherlands and analyzes three areas: pension and fertility reform, labor market participation and migration management. It has been found out that Korea has partially succeeded in widening the scope of welfare, encouraging women and the elderly to work and opening the selective migration policy. Nonetheless, limited effectiveness has been caused by fiscal pressure, gender inequality, inflexible labor institutions, and poor policy coordination. This paper finds that population aging in South Korea is not just a demographic or economic problem but a multi-dimensional governance problem. The experience of Korea is a good lesson to other countries that have experienced the same demographic transition.
Keywords
South Korea, population aging, pension reform, labor market, immigration policy, demographic transition
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 TimesReferences
[1]Yonhap News Agency, (2020). South Korea announces measures to deal with low birthrate and aging population, 15 December.
[2]World Bank. (2023). South Korea Birth Rate. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=KR
[3]OECD. (2018). Working Better with Age: Korea. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
[4]Kang, J., Park, J., & Cho, J. (2022). Inclusive Aging in Korea: Eradicating Senior Poverty. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042121
[5]Repkine, A., & Lee, H. C. (2022). Determinants of Healthy and Active Ageing in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416802
[6]Mamadouh, V. (2012). The Scaling of the “Invasion”: A Geopolitics of Migration Narratives in France and the Netherlands. Geopolitics, 17(2), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.578268
[7]Rygiel, K. (2011). Bordering Solidarities: Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement and Camps at Calais. Citizenship Studies, 15(1), 1–19.
[8]Kim, S. (2013). Pension Reform Options in Korea. IMF Conference Paper. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
[2]World Bank. (2023). South Korea Birth Rate. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=KR
[3]OECD. (2018). Working Better with Age: Korea. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
[4]Kang, J., Park, J., & Cho, J. (2022). Inclusive Aging in Korea: Eradicating Senior Poverty. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042121
[5]Repkine, A., & Lee, H. C. (2022). Determinants of Healthy and Active Ageing in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416802
[6]Mamadouh, V. (2012). The Scaling of the “Invasion”: A Geopolitics of Migration Narratives in France and the Netherlands. Geopolitics, 17(2), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.578268
[7]Rygiel, K. (2011). Bordering Solidarities: Migrant Activism and the Politics of Movement and Camps at Calais. Citizenship Studies, 15(1), 1–19.
[8]Kim, S. (2013). Pension Reform Options in Korea. IMF Conference Paper. International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
Copyright © 2025 Yifan Hou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
