Research on the Digital-Intelligent Transformation Pathway of Traditional Fishery under the Rural Revitalization Strategy: A Case Study of Nine Cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v6i4.4244
Abstract
With the comprehensively advancing the Rural Revitalization Strategy in China, accelerating the digital-intelligent transformation of traditional fisheries has become a critical pathway to achieving agricultural modernization. This study focuses on nine cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as its research subject, centers on the current development status of fisheries, policy-driven mechanisms, and the process of digital-intelligent transformation. Through data analysis and questionnaire surveys, the research identifies key constraints in the transformation process, including structural disparities in technology adoption, digital literacy deficits among practitioners, and gaps in policy execution. These factors contribute to an uneven development pattern in fisheries digitization, characterized by upper-level strength with lower-level weakness. In response, the paper proposes a systematic transformation strategy encompassing three dimensions: strengthening the foundation of intelligent infrastructure, improving financial and policy support mechanisms, and cultivating a multi-level talent ecosystem. The study concludes that the Greater Bay Area's practices in building smart fisheries not only provide replicable experience for other regions but also offers concrete evidence and actionable pathways for cultivating new quality productive forces in China's agricultural modernization.
Keywords
Rural Revitalization; Digital-Intelligent Transformation; Traditional Fishery; Smart Fishery
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 1 TimesReferences
[1]The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China & The State Council. (2025). Rural Revitalization Plan (2024–2027). New-Type Urbanization, (03), 4–10.
[2]Yang, Z., Peng, Y., Xiao, L., et al. (2025). The 2025 No. 1 Central Document: New Directions for Fishery Development. China Fisheries, (04), 63–66.
[3]Tan, C. (2024). Toward a Leading Fishery Nation: Innovative Paths for Green Development in China’s Aquatic Feed Industry. Feed Research, 47(20), 192–196.
[4]Yang, Z. (2021). Interpretation of Fishery Policies in the 2021 No. 1 Central Document. China Fishery Economy, 39(02), 1–8.
[5]Yang, Z., Peng, Y., Ye, M., et al. (2022). Analysis of the 2022 No. 1 Central Document and Its Fishery Policies. China Fishery Economy, 40(02), 1–9.
[6]Xu, L., Zhao, L., Li, X., et al. (2023). National Fishery Strategy in the 2023 No. 1 Central Document: Toward Building a Strong Fishery Nation. China Fishery Economy, 41(02), 1–13.
[7]Jiang, C. (2024). Key Highlights of the 2024 No. 1 Central Document. Rural Finance Research, (02), 3–13.
[8]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2024). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. World Agriculture, (07), 145.
[9]Hu, L., & Gu, Y. (2025). Developing New Quality Productive Forces in Agriculture Based on Local Conditions: Interpretation of the 2025 No. 1 Central Document. Business Manager, (03), 10–11.
[10]Zhu, M., Tan, H., Niu, Z., et al. (2024). Pathways and Technological Priorities for the Transformation and Upgrading of China’s Freshwater Fishery Sector. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 43(02), 1–9.
[11]Ma, W., Xing, W., & Gao, R. (2024). Empowering High-Quality Marine Economic Development with the Digital Economy. Economic Issues, (06), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2024.06.007
[12]Chen, X., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Recommendations for Developing New Quality Productive Forces in Distant-Water Fisheries. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 34(01), 146–152.
[2]Yang, Z., Peng, Y., Xiao, L., et al. (2025). The 2025 No. 1 Central Document: New Directions for Fishery Development. China Fisheries, (04), 63–66.
[3]Tan, C. (2024). Toward a Leading Fishery Nation: Innovative Paths for Green Development in China’s Aquatic Feed Industry. Feed Research, 47(20), 192–196.
[4]Yang, Z. (2021). Interpretation of Fishery Policies in the 2021 No. 1 Central Document. China Fishery Economy, 39(02), 1–8.
[5]Yang, Z., Peng, Y., Ye, M., et al. (2022). Analysis of the 2022 No. 1 Central Document and Its Fishery Policies. China Fishery Economy, 40(02), 1–9.
[6]Xu, L., Zhao, L., Li, X., et al. (2023). National Fishery Strategy in the 2023 No. 1 Central Document: Toward Building a Strong Fishery Nation. China Fishery Economy, 41(02), 1–13.
[7]Jiang, C. (2024). Key Highlights of the 2024 No. 1 Central Document. Rural Finance Research, (02), 3–13.
[8]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2024). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. World Agriculture, (07), 145.
[9]Hu, L., & Gu, Y. (2025). Developing New Quality Productive Forces in Agriculture Based on Local Conditions: Interpretation of the 2025 No. 1 Central Document. Business Manager, (03), 10–11.
[10]Zhu, M., Tan, H., Niu, Z., et al. (2024). Pathways and Technological Priorities for the Transformation and Upgrading of China’s Freshwater Fishery Sector. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 43(02), 1–9.
[11]Ma, W., Xing, W., & Gao, R. (2024). Empowering High-Quality Marine Economic Development with the Digital Economy. Economic Issues, (06), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2024.06.007
[12]Chen, X., & Zhang, Z. (2025). Recommendations for Developing New Quality Productive Forces in Distant-Water Fisheries. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 34(01), 146–152.
Copyright © 2025 Yi Jiang, Qinqin Zhu, Yingying Zhong, Xiaoqing Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License