Research on Factors Influencing Cognitive Load of Learners in Digital Learning Environment
Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v6i4.4291
Abstract
The impact mechanism of cognitive load on learners in digital learning environment is the result of dynamic interaction of multidimensional factors. The core influencing factor system is composed of environmental technical characteristics (such as interface complexity and media presentation), individual traits (including prior knowledge and cognitive style), task design elements (such as project phase division and time pressure), and collaborative interaction modes (such as target interdependence and interpretation depth). These factors significantly affect learning effectiveness by regulating the generation pathways of internal, external, and related cognitive loads. Among them, the adaptability between the environment and individuals, threshold control of task complexity, and optimization design of collaborative structures constitute key intervention nodes. The integrated framework proposed in the study provides a theoretical basis and practical path for reducing cognitive load and enhancing the scientific design of digital learning environments.
Keywords
Digital learning environment; Cognitive load; Influencing factors; Task design; Collaborative interaction
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 5 TimesReferences
[2]Nag Setu, J., Le, J. M., Kundu, R. K., Giesbrecht, B., Höllerer, T., Hoque, K. A., Desai, K., & Quarles, J. (2024). Predicting and Explaining Cognitive Load, Attention, and Working Memory in Virtual Multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108102.
[3]Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): A Theoretical Framework to Understand the Learning Benefits of Virtual Reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937–957.
[4]Todi, K., Bailly, G., Leiva, L. A., & Oulasvirta, A. (2021). Adapting user interfaces with model-based reinforcement learning.
[5]Cohen, J. E., Ross, R. S., & Stern, C. E. (2018). Predictability matters: role of the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in disambiguation of overlapping sequences. Learning & Memory, 25(8), 335.
[6]Liu Juan, Hu Xuelian, Wang Junhao, etc Research progress on intelligent assessment of cognitive load in digital learning [J/OL]. Journal of Wuhan University (Science Edition), 2025, (04):427-441.
[7]Zhang Muhua, Qi Binbin, Huang Zhinan How Immersive Virtual Reality Empowers Scientific Experiment Learning: Balancing Presence and Cognitive Load. Journal of Distance Education, 2024, 42 (05): 53-64
[8]Dan Meixian, Dong Yan Research on the influencing factors of cognitive load in project-based collaborative learning [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2022, (03):55-62.
[9]Zhang Lingyan, Zhuo Duotao, Lin Weiting, etc Research on the influencing factors of spatial position memory cognitive load in virtual learning environment [J]. Psychological Technology and Applications, 2023, 11 (06): 336-346
[10]Xue Yaofeng, Wang Kun, Qiu Yisheng.Cognitive load assessment of online learning based on multimodal data [J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2024, 34 (03): 79-88
[11]Zhao Yu Research on the Process of Online Interaction Behavior of College Students Based on Qualitative Analysis Method [J]. Contemporary Educational Practice and Teaching Research (Electronic Journal), 2020 (20): 37-39
[12]Cai Huiying Research on Collaborative Problem Solving Learning Supported by Semantic Graph Tools [D]. East China Normal University, 2016
[13]Liu Hongxia, Zhao Wei, Li Shiping A Study on the Impact of Learning Design on College Students' Academic Self Efficacy from the Perspective of Learning Analysis: A Discussion on the Consistency between Learning Design and Learning Analysis [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2017, (05):58-65.
[14]Sun Chongyong, Liu Dianzhi Comparison of subjective evaluation scales for cognitive load [J]. Psychological Science, 2013, 36 (01): 194-201
[15]Lv Xin, Liu Jingyao, Wei Liuqing The influence of target quantity and rotation angle of motion framework on the multi-target tracking performance of individuals with different cognitive styles in different fields [J]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 2019, 51 (01): 24-35
[16]Nie Changdi, Zhao Xue, Gao Zhihua (2024). Eye tracking study on the impact mechanism of different attentional loads on the risk decision-making framework effect Journal of Psychology, 56 (4), 541-553
[17]Ke Hongxia, Wang Huiping The characteristics of field dependence and independence and their impact on student information processing [J]. Journal of Yantai Vocational College, 2007, (03):26-29.
[18]Guo Tingting The overlap and separation of brain mechanisms for emotional conflict and general cognitive conflict [D]. Liaoning Normal University, 2022
[19]Li Jing, Zhang Kan The Influence of Cognitive Style on Navigation [J]. Ergonomics, 2007, (01): 46-47+55
[20]Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
[21]Zhao Jie, Liu Xuelan The Influence of Time Pressure, Achievement Goal Orientation, and Project Difficulty on Meta Memory Monitoring [J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 47 (03): 164-171.
[22]Li Y,Hu T,Wang Y, et al.Observation on prefrontal cortex activation in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a fNIRS study[J].Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience,2025,171560315-1560315.
[23]Liu Hongxia, Zhao Wei, Li Shiping Research on the Impact of Learning Design on College Students' Academic Self Efficacy from the Perspective of Learning Analysis: A Discussion on the Consistency between Learning Design and Learning Analysis [J]. Modern Distance Education, 2017, (05): 58-65.
Copyright © 2025 Ning Cui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License