Integrating Design Thinking into Higher Education: Enhancing Student Creativity and Critical Thinking
Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v5i6.3389
Abstract
This paper examines the integration of Design Thinking into higher education as a means to enhance student creativity and critical thinking skills. Design Thinking, with its structured yet flexible framework, offers a transformative approach to traditional teaching methods, fostering an environment that encourages innovation and practical problem-solving. The paper outlines the core phases of the Design Thinking process — Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test — and discusses how these can be applied within an academic setting to stimulate creative problem solving and interdisciplinary collaboration. It highlights the benefits of this approach in enriching the curriculum, evolving teaching strategies, and redefining assessment methods to better prepare students for the demands of the modern workforce. The paper also emphasizes the importance of nurturing creativity through cross-disciplinary approaches and the exploration of diverse perspectives. In conclusion, the integration of Design Thinking into higher education is posited as a strategic investment in the future, equipping students with the skills necessary to thrive in a rapidly changing world and to contribute meaningfully to society.
Keywords
design thinking, creativity, critical thinking, higher education, interdisciplinary collaboration
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 4 TimesReferences
[1]Sanchez P C I,Morales G D L,Feregrino R G.Exploring digital competencies in higher education: design and validation of instruments for the era of Industry 5.0[J].Frontiers in Education,2024,91415800-1415800.
[2]Dazeley R,Hunter G A,Meredith G, et al.Agile Backward Design: A Framework for planning higher education curriculum[J].The Australian Educational Researcher,2024,(prepublish):1-20.
[3]Boysen W S M,Lund O,Pugh S H, et al.On the border between play and art: A collaborative self-study of 76 playful didactic designs in higher education[J].Arts and Humanities in Higher Education,2024,23(4):308-329.
[4]Amaaz A,Mouradi A,Erradi M.A MODEL FOR PHYSICS PRACTICAL WORK USING MOBILE LEARNING AND LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) IN HIGHER EDUCATION: DESIGN, VALIDATION, AND EVALUATION[J].Journal of Baltic Science Education,2024,23(5):809-825.
[5]Rafi M S A.Creativity, criticality and translanguaging in assessment design: perspectives from Bangladeshi higher education[J].Applied Linguistics Review,2024,15(5):1887-1909.
[6]Peter B.Learning design ecosystems thinking: defying the linear imperative and designing for higher education at-scale[J].Journal of Work-Applied Management,2024,16(2):283-291.
[7]Du K,Mohamad B M,Zahidi M B A.Continuance Intention to Use Gamified Mobile Apps for English Speaking Skills Learning in Chinese English as Foreign Language (EFL) Higher Education[J].International Journal of Information and Education Technology,2024,14(9).
[8]Gablasova D,Harding L,Bottini R, et al.Building a corpus of student academic writing in EMI contexts: Challenges in corpus design and data collection across international higher education settings[J].Research Methods in Applied Linguistics,2024,3(3):100140-100140.
[9]Oo Z T,Kadyirov T,Kadyjrova L, et al.Design-based learning in higher education: Its effects on students’ motivation, creativity and design skills[J].Thinking Skills and Creativity,2024,53101621-101621.
[10]Barua L,Lockee B B.A review of strategies to incorporate flexibility in higher education course designs[J].Discover Education,2024,3(1):127-127.
[11]Xiaoyan L.Case Design and Practice of Integrating Ideological and Political Education into Higher Mathematics Teaching[J].International Education Forum,2024,2(6):65-72.
[2]Dazeley R,Hunter G A,Meredith G, et al.Agile Backward Design: A Framework for planning higher education curriculum[J].The Australian Educational Researcher,2024,(prepublish):1-20.
[3]Boysen W S M,Lund O,Pugh S H, et al.On the border between play and art: A collaborative self-study of 76 playful didactic designs in higher education[J].Arts and Humanities in Higher Education,2024,23(4):308-329.
[4]Amaaz A,Mouradi A,Erradi M.A MODEL FOR PHYSICS PRACTICAL WORK USING MOBILE LEARNING AND LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) IN HIGHER EDUCATION: DESIGN, VALIDATION, AND EVALUATION[J].Journal of Baltic Science Education,2024,23(5):809-825.
[5]Rafi M S A.Creativity, criticality and translanguaging in assessment design: perspectives from Bangladeshi higher education[J].Applied Linguistics Review,2024,15(5):1887-1909.
[6]Peter B.Learning design ecosystems thinking: defying the linear imperative and designing for higher education at-scale[J].Journal of Work-Applied Management,2024,16(2):283-291.
[7]Du K,Mohamad B M,Zahidi M B A.Continuance Intention to Use Gamified Mobile Apps for English Speaking Skills Learning in Chinese English as Foreign Language (EFL) Higher Education[J].International Journal of Information and Education Technology,2024,14(9).
[8]Gablasova D,Harding L,Bottini R, et al.Building a corpus of student academic writing in EMI contexts: Challenges in corpus design and data collection across international higher education settings[J].Research Methods in Applied Linguistics,2024,3(3):100140-100140.
[9]Oo Z T,Kadyirov T,Kadyjrova L, et al.Design-based learning in higher education: Its effects on students’ motivation, creativity and design skills[J].Thinking Skills and Creativity,2024,53101621-101621.
[10]Barua L,Lockee B B.A review of strategies to incorporate flexibility in higher education course designs[J].Discover Education,2024,3(1):127-127.
[11]Xiaoyan L.Case Design and Practice of Integrating Ideological and Political Education into Higher Mathematics Teaching[J].International Education Forum,2024,2(6):65-72.
Copyright © 2025 Yinhui Ning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
