Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Drainage Systems in Patients with Postoperative Intracranial Infections

Journal: Journal of Clinical Medicine Research DOI: 10.32629/jcmr.v5i4.3294

Liang Wang

Weihai Municipal Hospital, Weihai 264200, Shandong, China

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal drainage system and lumbar puncture therapy in the treatment of patients with intracranial infection after intracranial aneurysm clamping. Methods: Patients with postoperative intracranial infections were randomly divided into a test group and a control group. Patients in the test group were treated with anti-adhesion lubrication extracorporeal drainage system, and patients in the control group were treated with lumbar puncture. Compare the time of improvement of conscious state, the time of improvement of cerebrospinal fluid indexes, and the difference in the incidence of hydrocephalus and morbidity and mortality rates between the two groups of patients. Results: The extracorporeal drainage system can continuously drain the cerebrospinal fluid, effectively reduce the intracranial pressure, and also can avoid the pain caused by repeated lumbar puncture to the patients, dynamically observe the cerebrospinal fluid properties, monitor the intracranial pressure, and reduce the workload of clinicians. Conclusion: The extracorporeal drainage system has good effectiveness and safety in the treatment of patients with intracranial infection after intracranial aneurysm clipping.

Keywords

intracranial aneurysm; intracranial infection; cerebrospinal fluid drainage

References

[1] WANG Kang,HUANG Ge,LI Xiaohui,et al. Clinical analysis of intracranial infection after aneurysm clamping[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Neurological Diseases,2019,22(12):1298-1302.
[2] BUCHANANIA,DONOHO D A,PATEL A, et al. Predictors of Surgical Site Infection After NonemergentCraniotomy:A Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis[J].World Neurosurg,2018,120:e440-e452.DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.102.
[3] KAUR G,STEIN LK,BOEHME A,et al.Risk of readmission for infection after surgical intervention for intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. J Neurol Sei,2019,399: 161-166.DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2019.02.016.
[4] QUAN Li-Fang, ZHU Li-Juan, YE Yi-Zhen. Application of extracorporeal drainage system in intracranial infection after intracranial aneurysm clamping[J]. Journal of practical medical technology,2015,22(06):653-654.
[5] ZHOU Quan-Ming,CHEN Yao,HUANG Jian-Huang,et al. Clinical effects of stereotactic minimally invasive soft-channel puncture hematoma drainage versus open hematoma removal in the treatment of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Medical Equipment,2021,34(21):101-102.
[6] HAN Chunyang, LIU Yu, FENG Liang, et al. Analysis of risk factors for rebleeding after minimally invasive puncture hematoma drainage in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and establishment of prediction model[J]. Journal of Clinical Neurology,2023,36(03):196-201.
[7] Kong W, Xue YH, Lin YH, et al. Early continuous lumbar large pool cerebrospinal fluid external drainage in heavy craniocerebral injury after craniotomy[J]. Guangdong Medicine, 2011, 32(5):677.
[8] Liu Xiaolei, Dong Xin, Yao Xiaofeng, et al. Treatment of intracranial infection after lateral ventricular external drainage by continuous drainage with lumbar large pool placement[J]. Medical Review, 2012, 18(24):4265-4266, 4272.

Copyright © 2025 Liang Wang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License