A Study of the Aestheticism Paradox in The Picture of Dorian Gray

Journal: Arts Studies and Criticism DOI: 10.32629/asc.v6i5.4601

Jiaqi Wang

Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, Hunan, China

Abstract

Oscar Wilde, a leading 19th-century British proponent of aestheticism and "art for art's sake," embodies profound contradictions within his sole novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray. This work intertwines aesthetic ideals with social morality, creating an ambivalence central to Wilde's aestheticism paradox. Analyzing the novel, this paper explores Wilde's paradoxical style through three lenses: paradoxes in protagonist portrayal, tensions between morality and aesthetic art, and conflicts between aesthetic ideals and social reality. It reveals how Wilde's self-contradictory writing critiques aestheticism's limitations and Victorian society, enriching the work's psychological and social depth beyond mere theoretical discourse.

Keywords

Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray, aestheticism, paradox

References

[1] Adamskic, K. The paradoxical self: duality and ambiguity in the works and lives of Oscar Wilde and Morrissey. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia. 2021; 21(1): 285-302.
[2] Wilde, O. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Nanjing: Yilin Press; 2014.
[3] Yang, F. On the paradox in The Picture of Dorian Gray. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology. 2008 ;(4): 129-130.
[4] Fan, X.Y. (2016) The contradiction of Oscar Wilde's aestheticism in The Picture of Dorian Gray. Master's Thesis, Harbin Normal University, Harbin.
[5] Guo, Y.S. & Xin, X. On Oscar Wilde's aestheticism and moral view of art. Literary and Art Criticism. 2020; (2): 26-32.
[6] Zhou, X.Y. Aestheticism and Consumer Culture. Beijing: Peking University Press; 2002.
[7] Zhou, X. Critique of Aesthetic Modernity. Beijing: The Commercial Press; 2005.
[8] Urbanovich, U. (2022) The coflict between hedonism and aestheticism in the novel The Picture of Dorian Gray. Master's Thesis, Southwest University, Chongqing.

Copyright © 2025 Jiaqi Wang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License