Understanding the Feasibility of the Common Set of Performance Management Planning Based on Hofstede’s Framework of Cultural Dimension
Journal: Modern Economics & Management Forum DOI: 10.32629/memf.v2i3.364
Abstract
Performance management is one of the most important parts of human resource management practice and policy. Multinational Corporations pay more attention to their performance management and to help their corporation becomes a high-performance organization. The performance management (PM) system is a necessary part of Multinational Corporation’s management system. On the other hand, the performance system has close relationship with rewards, development and job analysis which is other important part of human resource management in multinational corporations. Multinational corporations work hard to improve their performance management practices ensuring their employees, teams and their business units complete their objective output. The employees and organizations have been driven by the important performance tools which impact both on individuals and team’s performance. This paper introduces the multinational corporation’s performance management system and compares the performance management characteristics and the feasibility of the common set of performance management planning of French companies and Chinese companies based on Hofstede’s framework of cultural dimensions.
Keywords
performance management, multinational corporations, Hofstede’s framework
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 15 TimesIndexation
Download Index RecordReferences
[2] Aidong, L. Performance management in multinational companies in China. Shanghai: Fudan University Press; 2006.
[3] Björkman, I., Xiucheng, F. Human resource management and the performance of Western firms in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2002; 13(6): 853-864. [Online] Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585190210134246 [Accessed: 8 January, 2012]
[4] Barzantny, C., Festing, M. Performance management in France and Germany. London: Routledge; 2008.
[5] Bai, X., Bennington, L. Performance appraisal in the Chinese state-owned coal industry. International Journal of Business Performance Management. 2005; 7(3): 275-287.
[6] Brewster, C, Larsen, H, Henrik, H. Human resource management in Europe: evidence from ten countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 1992; 3(3): 409-434.
[7] Brewster, C., Tyson. S. International comparisons in human resource management. London: Pitman; 1991.
[8] Claus, L. M, Briscoe, D. R. (2006) What we know and don`t know about performance management from an international/global perspective: A review and analysis of empirical research. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, August 11-16, Atlanta, GA.
[9] Cooke, F. L. Performance management in China. London: Routledge; 2008.
[10] Cooke, N. Multinational companies and global human resource strategies. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group; 2003.
[11] Dowling, P. J., Festing, M. International human resource management managing people in a multinational context. South-Western Cengage Learning; 2008.
[12] Faulkner, D., Pitkethly, R. Child, J. International mergers and acquisitions in the UK 1985-1994: A comparison of national HRM practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2002; 13(1): 106-122.
[13] Galang, M. C. The transferability question: Comparing HRM practices in the Philippines with the US and Canada. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2004; 15(7): 1207-1233.
[14] Hempel, S. Designing multinational benefits programs: The role of national culture. Journal of World Business. 1998; 33(3): 277-294. [Online] Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951699800753 [Accessed: 8 January, 2012]
[15] Hilary, H. International human resource management. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2003.
[16] Kim, K. I., Park, H. and Suzuki N.Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: A comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal. 1990; 33(1): 188-198. [Online] Available at: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=8f48b3fa-a16d-4ca9-a7fc-8b45e5e01ec2%40sessionmgr4&vid=2&hid=18 [Accessed: 8 January, 2012]
[17] Miao Zhang. Transferring human resource management across national boundaries: The case of Chinese multinational companies in the UK. Employee Relations. 2003; 25(6): 613-626.
[18] Poirson, P. The characteristics and dynamics of human resource management in France. London: Kogan; 1993.
[19] Selmer, J. International management in China: cross-cultural issues. Psychology Press; 1998. [Online] Available at: http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/International_management_in_China.html?hl=zh-CN&id=36i22zJjMuAC [Accessed: 8 January, 2012]
[20] Sullivan, J., Suzuki, T. Kondo, Y. Managerial Theories and the Performance Control Process in Japanese and American Work Group. National Academy of Management Proceedings; 1985.
[21] Tayeb, M. H. International human resource management: a multinational company perspective. Oxford University Press; 2005.
[22] Von Glinow, M. A., Drost, E. Teagarden, M. Convergence of IHRM practices: lessons learned from a globally distributed consortium of theory and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2002; 40(1): 146-166.
Copyright © 2021 Yi Guo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License