How Harmful Is the Commercialization of Higher Education for the Academic and Social Environment?

Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v2i6.586

Meixue Gao

Hebei Hengshui Middle School, Hengshui, Heibei, China

Abstract

The commercial market for higher education in Europe is expanding as governments cut spending on universities in the wake of the 2008 global economic crisis, and universities must be self-sufficient to survive. This commercialization is mainly reflected in the fact that universities begin to pay more attention to fund accumulation rather than improving academic value. With the continuous increase of tuition fees in colleges and universities, students are regarded as consumers and universities are essential commodities needed by consumers. Although commercialization of higher education has some beneficial aspects, such as more funds for schools to provide students with more advanced equipment and more comfortable learning environment, overall, the threat of commercialization to academic quality and social environment cannot be compensated for by those advantages. This paper aims to find out the two main reasons for the commercialization of higher education and the three threats to the social and academic environment brought by the marketing of higher education. Also, the paper also puts forward corresponding solutions for the three major risks; the two reasons analyzed in this paper are mainly the economic crisis and the development of globalization. The three threats are mainly aimed at the teaching quality of educational value and the financial pressure of students. At the same time, the paper gives three corresponding solutions to the threats. This paper argues that the commercialization of higher education severely hinders the improvement of educational value, reduces teaching quality, and brings heavy pressure to students' economy, which directly hinders the healthy development of higher education. If higher education institutions can adopt corresponding strategies to mitigate the threat of commercialization, the commercialization market of higher education may bring many opportunities for the development of higher education industry.

Keywords

higher education, commercialization, academic value, strategies, university, threats, teaching quality

References

[1]Aktan, C. (2007). Global Higher Education Trends and Transformation Paradigms. In: Higher Education in the Age of Change, Yaşar University Publishing: 1-43
[2]Altbach, P. G. Reisberg, L. Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. Paris: UNESCO.
[3]Bonce, L. (2016). Studies in Higher Education. UK: Informa UK Limited.
[4]Browne, J. 2010. Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education: An Independent Reviewof Higher Education Funding and Student Finance. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

[5]Bok, D. (2007). Higher Education in America. US: United States of America,102-104
[6]Barnett, R. (2008). Translated by İlhan Tekeli. University Publications: 100-117
[7]Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism' in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2): 217-235.

[8]Brown, S., Race, P., Smith, B. (1996). 500 tips on assessment. Milton Park: Routledge Falmer.
[9]Brown, G. (2001). Assessment: A guide for Lecturers. New York: Generic Centre: Learning and Teaching Support Network.
[10]Bercowitz, J., Feldman, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31: 175-188.

[11]College Board. (2008-09). Trends in College Pricing. Retrieved March 18th, 2009 [online]. Available from [31 May 2019]
[12]CONSTANTIN (2015). Higher education market in central and eastern Europe in the post-crisis period. Comparative analysis. Post-PhD fellow: Romanian Academy.
[13]Cuseo, J. (2004). The empirical case against large class size: adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. The Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1): 5–21.

[14]Daniel, J. (2013). Daffodil University. Paper presented at the international conference on tertiary education. Realities and challenges.
[15]Dearing, R. (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
[16]Domino, S. Library, T. Lutwiller, D. Superczynski, Sh. And Tian, R. (2006). Higher education marketing concerns: factors influence student's choice of Colleges. The Business Review, 6(2): 157-163.

[17]House of Commons (2018). The higher education market. Forty-Fifth Report of Session. 2017–19.
[18]Jenkins, A. (2002). Comment on "class size". Posted on: Listserv for the Professional & Organizational Development Network. Higher Education.
[19]Marine, F; Sing, A. (2014). Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalizing higher education environment: pedagogical, quality and equity issues. Higher Education, 67(6): 761–782.
[20]Murat, A. (2010). Conference paper. [online] Available from [19 may 2019]
[21]Obama, B. (2007). Making College Affordable for Everyone. Retrieved April 20th, 2009. [online] Available from [31 May 2019]
[22]Pucciarellia, F, Kaplan, A (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons. [online] Available from . [28 May 2019]
[23]Robinson, A. (2018). The Recruitment Agent in Internationalized Higher Education: Commercial Broker and Cultural Mediator. Journal of studies in international education, 22(3): 228-229.
[24]Slauther, S. and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. John Hopkins University Press.

[25]The Economist London (2011). Britain: Race to the top; Paying for higher education. London. [online] available from [19 May 2019]
[26]Yuan, L. (2013). A white paper: MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. [online] Available from [29 May 2019].
[27]Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45: 307-335.

Copyright © 2021 Meixue Gao

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License