An Analysis of the Development Path of Institutional Research Facing University Data Governance — Based on the Enlightenment from Institutional Research of University of California
Journal: Journal of Higher Education Research DOI: 10.32629/jher.v2i5.519
Abstract
In the context of university data governance, the orientation of institutional research in China is to provide data support and services based on decision-making scenarios. The content and process of work are closely related to data. The research fields specifically involve university students and other affairs in teaching, teacher management, resource management and planning, policy, management and so on. At present, with the continuous improvement of the level of data governance in colleges and universities, the development of institutional research in colleges and universities is mainly faced with problems such as insufficient data awareness, poor data quality and lack of data sharing platform. Therefore, universities should attach importance to top-level design and establish "data-driven decision-making" mechanism, create a data culture and develop data-related standards, build comprehensive database and build data sharing platform.
Keywords
data governance, institutional research, university management
Full Text
PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 9 TimesIndexation
Download Index RecordReferences
[1] Liu Xianjun, Chen Min, Zhang Junchao. Foundations, Manifestations and Suggestions for China’s Institutional Research Moving towards Maturity[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2020, 41(09):32-39.
[2] Chang Tongshan. Institutional Research Organizations in Universities and Colleges[J]. Fudan Education Forum, 2016, 14(05):27-34.
[3] Liu Xianjun. Advancing University Research and Building University Decision Supporting System[J]. University Education Science, 2017(01):10-14+123.
[4] Chang Tongshan. Institutional Research and Learning Analytics[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2021(02):6-14.
[5] Liu Xianjun, Zhao Juming, Chen Min. Developing the institutional research and improving the management level of colleges and universities — Thinking on how higher education Institutions Serve colleges and universities[J]. China Higher Education Research, 2002(03):37-38.
[6] University of California Annual Accountability Report 2021[EB/OL]. https://accountability. universityofcalifornia. edu/2021/documents/pdfs/aar-2021-report. pdf.
[7] Zhang Wei. Improving the level of scientific management in universities by leveraging institutional research[J]. China Higher Education, 2007(24):16-17.
[8] Zhao Juming. Scientific management and institutional research[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2007(07):55-58.
[2] Chang Tongshan. Institutional Research Organizations in Universities and Colleges[J]. Fudan Education Forum, 2016, 14(05):27-34.
[3] Liu Xianjun. Advancing University Research and Building University Decision Supporting System[J]. University Education Science, 2017(01):10-14+123.
[4] Chang Tongshan. Institutional Research and Learning Analytics[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2021(02):6-14.
[5] Liu Xianjun, Zhao Juming, Chen Min. Developing the institutional research and improving the management level of colleges and universities — Thinking on how higher education Institutions Serve colleges and universities[J]. China Higher Education Research, 2002(03):37-38.
[6] University of California Annual Accountability Report 2021[EB/OL]. https://accountability. universityofcalifornia. edu/2021/documents/pdfs/aar-2021-report. pdf.
[7] Zhang Wei. Improving the level of scientific management in universities by leveraging institutional research[J]. China Higher Education, 2007(24):16-17.
[8] Zhao Juming. Scientific management and institutional research[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2007(07):55-58.
Copyright © 2021 Xiaoru Chen, Xiaodan Zhou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License