The Effect of the Sequence of Image Distortion Correction on the Accuracy of Connection Point Generation

Journal: Journal of Building Technology DOI: 10.32629/jbt.v2i1.143

Yuanyuan Wang

Land Surveying, Planning and Design Institute of Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group

Abstract

In this paper, the UAV photogrammetry data of two hills and two flat sampling areas are selected. The image data are processed by pixel grid software through different operation methods, and the effect of the two methods is compared. The results show that after the distortion correction, the image is rotated manually or the flight angle in the POS data is directly changed, which has no obvious effect on the error in the number of iterations of the automatic connection point. When the distortion correction is not corrected, the photo is rotated, and the angle of the Omega, Phi and Kappa angles is obtained from the UAV autopilot system, and makes the corner element higher precision when the automatic connection point is generated. Add Kappa to the POS data by 90, and then correct distortion while choosing to rotate pictures; Set the Omega, Phi is 0, Kappa angle from the IMU, this method avoids the influence of the angle deviation caused by the tilt or jitter of the flight process, so it is better to line elements when the automatic connection point is generated.

Keywords

UAV photogrammetry; pixel grid software; distortion correction; automatic connection point

Full Text

PDF - Viewed/Downloaded: 2 Times

Indexation

Download Index Record

References

[1] Tang M. (2014). Research on Several Key Issues in Preprocessing and Matching of Sequence UAV Images. Southwest Jiaotong University.
[2] Ahdel-Aziz Y.I. and Karara H.M. (1971). Direct Linear Trasformation into Object Space Coordinates in Close-T-allge Photogram Etry. In proceedinds Syypisium Close-Range Photogramm Etry. Universiy of Illinois at Urbana-Calibration, urbana, Illinois American, 1-18.
[3] Binger N. (1987). The Application of Laser Radar Technology. Sensors, 4(4): 42-44.
[4] Ji Q. and Dai S. (2004). Self-calibration of a Rotating Camera with a Translational Offset. Robotics & Automation IEEE Transactions on, 20(1): 1-14.
[5] Friess P. (1991). Aerotriangulation with GPS-Methods, Experience, Exception. Proceedings of the 43rd Phtogrammetric Week, Stuttgart University, 43-49.
[6] Ackermann F. (1992). Prospects of Kinematic GPS for Aerial Triangulation. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, (4): 326-338.
[7] Li D.R. and Yuan X.X. (1995). GPS-supported Bundle Block Adjustment -- An Empirical Results from Test Field Taiyuan. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, (2): 7.
[8] Zheng M.T., Zhang Y.J. and Zhu J.F. (2017). A Fast and Effective Block Adjustment Method with Big Data. Acta Geidaetica et Carrographica Sinica, 46(2): 188-197.
[9] Liu J., Wang L.M. and Yang L.B. (2015). Geometric Correction of GF-1 Satellite Images Based on Block Adjustment of Rational Polynomial Model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(22): 146-154.
[10] Yuan X.X. (2001). The Principle and Application of GPS Assisted Aerial Triangulation. Surveying and Mapping Press.
[11] Zhang J.Q. (2003). Photogrammetry. Wuhan University Press.
[12] Lin J.J. and Cang G.H. (2005). Photogrammetry. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing.

Citing this article:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License