Observation on the Nursing Effect of Prone Position Ventilation Applied to Children with Respiratory Failure

Journal: Advanced Journal of Nursing DOI: 10.32629/ajn.v2i1.275

Aili Peng, Litao Guo, Jing Xu, Jingrong Fan

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China

Abstract

Objective — To compare the effects of two prone position ventilation methods on children with respiratory failure, to obtain a safer and more effective way to guide clinical nursing work. Methods — 48 cases of children who were admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital from February 2018 to August 2019 and applied mechanical ventilation were divided into groups based on a random number table. The odd numbers were included in the experimental group (continuous prone position ventilation group, the duration of continuous prone position exceeded 12 hours, a total of 25 cases). The even numbers were included in the control group (intermittent prone position ventilation group, prone position for 3 hours at a time, alternating with supine position and lateral position, total prone position duration 12 hours, a total of 23 cases). Oxygenation index (OI), PH value, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) at 24h, 48h, 72h of the two groups of children, as well as their ventilator use time and ICU hospital stay were compared. Results — Continuous prone position ventilation and intermittent prone position ventilation have no statistical significance on arterial blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), arterial blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), ventilator duration, ICU length of stay in children with respiratory failure (P>0.05), but with the increase of the total length of the prone position, when reaching more than 36 hours, the trend of oxygenation index (OI) of the experimental group and the control group can be seen to decline.  Conclusion — In this study, by comparing the effects of two prone position ventilation modes, it was found that intermittent prone position ventilation and continuous prone position ventilation had no difference in the treatment of children with respiratory failure. When children are treated in continuous prone and intermittent prone positions, the total prone position can last up to 36 hours, which can effectively improve the clinical treatment effect. In view of the characteristics of pediatric patients and the difficulty in nursing critically ill patients with tracheal intubation, it is recommended that pediatric patients can use intermittent prone ventilation to complete treatment when the cumulative time in the prone position reaches more than 36 hours.

Keywords

prone position ventilation, respiratory failure, prone duration

References

[1] Luciano, Gattinoni, Paolo, et al. Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Rationale, indications, and limits. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 188(11): 1286-1293.
[2] Fan Xuwei. Clinical observation of prone position mechanical ventilation adjuvant drug treatment of severe pneumonia in children. Modern Diagnosis and Treatment. 2017; 28 (1): 43-45.
[3] Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2015; 16(5): 428-439.
[4] Tang Mengqin, the implementation and nursing of prone position ventilation in ICU. Psychologist. 2017; 23(24): 203-204.
[5] Chen Xi, Wu Qiyun, Wang Xin, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of prone position ventilation on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of Nursing of Chinese People's Liberation Army. 2016; 33(7): 20-23.
[6] Sud S, Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, et al. Effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation on mortality among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systenatic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2014; 186(10): E381-E390.
[7] Lei Guangfeng, Zhang Xueqing, Zhang Suxia. Meta analysis of prone and supine ventilation in ALI/ARDS patients. Journal of Nursing Science. 2016; 31(22): 87-92.
[8] Chen Chen, Lu Wei, Wu Ling, etc. A systematic review of the literature on medical adhesive-related skin injuries. Journal of Nursing Science. 2016; 31(20): 99-103.

Copyright © 2021 Aili Peng, Litao Guo, Jing Xu, Jingrong Fan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License